"English for Academic Purposes in the Korean University Context: Teachers’ Opinions on What is Being Taught, How it is Being Taught, and Possible Improvements"

  • Chris Kobylinski Communicative English at Hanguk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul, South Korea
  • Richard Prasad College of English Education Committee at Hanyang University in Seoul, South Korea

Abstract

As the use of English in the academic world increases around the world, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) continues to grow. The increase in demand for EAP courses and teachers often finds English teachers having to prepare students to study in fields that they themselves might not be familiar with or teach a style of course they might not have done before. In addition to these obstacles, there are many institutional barriers that prevent teachers from teaching EAP properly. This paper examines these problems in the South Korean university context. Currently many Native English Speaking (NES) English teachers are transitioning from teaching Commutative Language Teaching (CLT) classes to teaching EAP courses and are experiencing many problems and barriers as they transition and teach EAP. 10 NES university teachers were interviewed in order to gather qualitative data about their experiences in teaching EAP courses in an attempt to better understand the current situation in many Korean universities. The data gathered revealed many similar problems and led to ideas for possible improvement on many levels.
Keywords: EAP, EFL, ELT, ESP, CBI, CLT, Korea.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, O. (2012). Exploring teacher beliefs in teaching EAP at low proficiency levels. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2): 99-111.
Anderson, R. (2014). A parallel approach to ESAP teaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136: 194-202.
Brinton, D. (2012). Content-based instruction in English for Specific Purposes. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. New York: Blackwell Publishing. pp: 1-8.
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: teaching for perceived needs and imagined futures in the worlds of work, study and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1): 133–156.
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chan, S.C.C. (2018). Proposing and illustrating a research-informed approach to curriculum development for specific topics in business English. English for Specific Purposes, 52: 27-46.
Chang, H.J. (2009) A study on curriculum development for general English for the ABBEEK Program. English Language & Literature Teaching, 15 (1): 327-348
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flowerdew, J. & Peacock, M. (2001). Issues in EAP: A preliminary perspective. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purpose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp: 8-24.
Flowerdew, J. (2016). English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) Writing: Making the case. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(1): 5-32
Falaus, A. (2017). The current challenges of teaching ESP. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 200: 012059. Available at:10.1088/1757-899X/200/1/012059
Gillett, A.J. (2011). What is EAP? Retrieved from http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/eap.htm. [Accessed August 14, 2018].
Hyland, K. (2002.) Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes 21(4): 385-395.
Hyland, K. & L. Hamp-Lyons (2002). EAP: Issues and Directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1): 1-12
Hyland,K. (2006). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Educationm 16(4): 363–377.
Hyland, K. (2018). Sympathy for the devil? A defense of EAP. Language Teaching, 51(3): 383-399. Available at:10.1017/S0261444818000101
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2018). Why researching EAP practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 31, A3-A4.
James, M.A. (2014). Learning transfer in English-for-academic-purposes contexts: A systematic review of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 1-13.
Kwon, S.H. (2012). Development of general English courses at the university level: Analysis of curricular and learner needs. English Language & Literature Teaching, 18(4): 211-235.
Lee, Y.J. (2014). General English or ESP/EAP? Rethinking college students’ needs for GE and ESP/EAP. English Language & Literature Teaching, 20(1): 133-156.
Nakano, M.K. & N. Kusada (2010). Motivation and content in an EAP classroom. Journal of Soka Women's College, 40: 2010-03, 153-167
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Song, B. (2006). Content-based ESL instruction; long-term effects and outcomes. English for Specific Purposes, 25(4):420-437.
Savignon, S. J. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: what’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1): 207–220.
Seong, M.H., H.J. Chang & H.J. Kim (2007). Needs analysis of university students for the general English curriculum development. Modern English Education, 8(3): 318-340.
Wette, R. (2014). Teachers’ practices in EAP writing instruction: Use of models and modeling. System, 42: 60-69.
Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22: 256-265.
Wingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A ‘literacy’ journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1): 26-37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006
Statistics
32 Views | 42 Downloads
How to Cite
[1]
Kobylinski, C. and Prasad, R. 2018. "English for Academic Purposes in the Korean University Context: Teachers’ Opinions on What is Being Taught, How it is Being Taught, and Possible Improvements". International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning. 4, 2 (Aug. 2018), 58-67. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.42.58.67.
Section
Articles